Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

selfoss (service): fix port in service config #50411

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 15, 2018

Conversation

rafaelgg
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation for this change

The services.selfoss.database.port option has type types.nullOr types.int. However it is then used as a string, which makes even the default config fail. This change fixes that.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ let
db_database=${cfg.database.name}
db_username=${cfg.database.user}
db_password=${cfg.database.password}
db_port=${if (cfg.database.port != null) then cfg.database.port
db_port=${if (cfg.database.port != null) then (toString cfg.database.port)
else default_port}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would use:

${toString (if (cfg.database.port != null) then cfg.database.port
                    else default_port)}

Then default_port has the same type as cfg.database.port

@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit 8bf4fe8 into NixOS:master Nov 15, 2018
@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Nov 15, 2018

Is a backport required?

rafaelgg added a commit to rafaelgg/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2018
@rafaelgg
Copy link
Contributor Author

rafaelgg commented Nov 15, 2018

Is a backport required?

I have opened #50436 Thanks @Mic92 !

Mic92 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2018
selfoss (service): fix port in service config (backport of #50411)
@rafaelgg rafaelgg deleted the fix-selfoss-port branch November 15, 2018 23:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants