Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

makeRustPlatform: refactor to make it easier to understand #50878

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 21, 2018

Conversation

Mic92
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 Mic92 commented Nov 21, 2018

Motivation for this change

It is now clearer what is supposed to be in the rust attribute set
without having studied type theory. The amount of code is identically.

Let's see if the ofborg's evaluation can confirm that this is noop.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

It is now clearer what is supposed to be in the rust attribute set
without having studied type theory. The amount of code is identically.
@Mic92
Copy link
Member Author

Mic92 commented Nov 21, 2018

It shows

x86_64-linux	tests.nixos-functions.nixosTest-test
x86_64-linux tests.nixos-functions.nixos-test

which is always there, so we can count this as a noop.

@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit 5abdde2 into NixOS:master Nov 21, 2018
@Mic92 Mic92 deleted the rust-cleanup branch November 21, 2018 13:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants