Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

vimPlugins: init vim-liquid #57810

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 13, 2019
Merged

vimPlugins: init vim-liquid #57810

merged 1 commit into from Apr 13, 2019

Conversation

anderslundstedt
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation for this change

Add the vim-liquid plugin.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@anderslundstedt
vimPlugin: init vim-liquid
4fbc3cb 
Added the vim-liquid plugin by following the instructions at

https://nixos.wiki/wiki/Vim#Adding_new_plugins
@anderslundstedt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there any particular reason that this very simple pull request has not been merged yet?

@xeji
Copy link
Contributor

xeji commented Apr 13, 2019

@GrahamcOfBorg build vimPlugins.vim-liquid

@xeji xeji merged commit 84715fb into NixOS:master Apr 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
6.topic: vim 8.has: package (new) 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@anderslundstedt @xeji @GrahamcOfBorg