Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

deepin.deepin-turbo: init at 0.0.2 #59122

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 7, 2019
Merged

deepin.deepin-turbo: init at 0.0.2 #59122

merged 2 commits into from Apr 7, 2019

Conversation

romildo
Copy link
Contributor

@romildo romildo commented Apr 7, 2019 •
edited

Motivation for this change

Add deepin-turbo (a daemon that helps to launch applications faster).

Tracking deepin packaging: #59023

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@romildo
Copy link
Contributor Author

romildo commented Apr 7, 2019

@GrahamcOfBorg build deepin.deepin-turbo

@xeji xeji merged commit 2aecd15 into NixOS:master Apr 7, 2019
@romildo romildo deleted the upd.deepin.deepin-turbo branch April 7, 2019 23:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@tadeokondrak tadeokondrak tadeokondrak left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
8.has: package (new) 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100 11.by: package-maintainer
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@romildo @tadeokondrak @GrahamcOfBorg @xeji