New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add label for exactly 1 rebuild #395
Conversation
This is a good idea. I'd like to continue applying the |
It is fundamentally different to review a leaf package with no other reverse dependencies in Nixpkgs and one that has at least one reverse dependency, so make those separate labels.
@grahamc Okay, done, and I added the proper tests now. Also, your suggestion makes this change will be backward compatible, so that's nice! By the way, I didn't commit this but in order to build this I had to add the
If you want me to add those |
Please do add the annotations :)
…On Thu, Sep 26, 2019, at 12:52 AM, Ryan Mulligan wrote:
@grahamc <https://github.com/grahamc> Okay, done, and I added the proper tests now. Also, your suggestion makes this change will be backward compatible, so that's nice!
By the way, I didn't commit this but in order to build this I had to add the `dyn` annotation in 7 places because of this error:
`error: trait objects without an explicit `dyn` are deprecated`
If you want me to add those `dyn` annotations to this branch, I can.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#395?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAASXLFYWQ3J2O56PE2XWJLQLQ5XRA5CNFSM4ITBHPA2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD7UI5DA#issuecomment-535334540>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAASXLGOPMLE7ANAK77CZNLQLQ5XRANCNFSM4ITBHPAQ>.
|
@grahamc Added. |
@grahamc Do you need anything else from me to merge this? |
Even though the CI is failing, I think this is ready to go, because the CI errors seem unrelated. |
It is fundamentally different to review a leaf package with no other reverse dependencies in Nixpkgs and one that has at least one reverse dependency, so make those separate labels.
I expect rolling this out is going to have to coincide with updating the labels and adding the new labels.