Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fsfe-reuse: Init at 0.3.4 #59609

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

kirelagin
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

Add new package, the lint tool for the REUSE Initiative.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@kirelagin kirelagin changed the title fsfe-reuse: Init at 2018-12-01 (master) fsfe-reuse: Init at 0.3.4 Apr 15, 2019
@kirelagin
Copy link
Member Author

The package maintainer was kind enough to upload a new version to PyPI when I asked them.

@dtzWill
Copy link
Member

dtzWill commented Apr 17, 2019

Is this same as #59609 ?

@kirelagin
Copy link
Member Author

@dtzWill I’m sorry?

@kirelagin
Copy link
Member Author

Ooooooh, you probably meant #57851.

@FlorianFranzen
Copy link
Contributor

FlorianFranzen commented Apr 26, 2019

Is there a reason to prefer PiPy over GitLab? The GitLab repo will at least always be up to date.

@kirelagin kirelagin closed this Aug 9, 2019
@kirelagin kirelagin mentioned this pull request May 24, 2020
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants