You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The filtering/sorting/abstract list customization options in the reviewer track view is a lot more limited than the manager's view.
Reviewer track view
Manager view
Simple(?) fix
It would be already helpful if the reviewer track view can have the same filtering/sorting/customization options as the managers view.
Particular use cases
It would be helpful if the reviewer track view can be made much more similar to the manager's view, to enable sorting according to scores. This will enable reviewers to impose a ranking for the abstracts in the track, if they wish.
It would also be helpful to have the extra filter for abstracts proposed for multiple tracks, as well as a filter for abstracts that were only proposed in one track.
Ideal but probably complicated
It would be ideal if it will be possible for managers to fully customize the customization options/columns that are available to the reviewer, and define some "default" columns.
Thanks,
Ying
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The filtering/sorting/abstract list customization options in the reviewer track view is a lot more limited than the manager's view.
Reviewer track view
Manager view
Simple(?) fix
It would be already helpful if the reviewer track view can have the same filtering/sorting/customization options as the managers view.
Particular use cases
It would be helpful if the reviewer track view can be made much more similar to the manager's view, to enable sorting according to scores. This will enable reviewers to impose a ranking for the abstracts in the track, if they wish.
It would also be helpful to have the extra filter for abstracts proposed for multiple tracks, as well as a filter for abstracts that were only proposed in one track.
Ideal but probably complicated
It would be ideal if it will be possible for managers to fully customize the customization options/columns that are available to the reviewer, and define some "default" columns.
Thanks,
Ying
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: