New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Go 1.13 #68135
Add Go 1.13 #68135
Conversation
@rvolosatovs I did a
|
Indeed, I see. At least in case of |
9be54b0
to
98e7980
Compare
pkgs/applications/version-management/git-and-tools/ghq/default.nix
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
6b21ff0
to
2e309a4
Compare
pkgs/applications/version-management/git-and-tools/ghq/default.nix
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
094d9d9
to
d4cb16f
Compare
@adisbladis do you have fixes for (any of) packages broken by 1.13 update? |
Co-authored-by: Roman Volosatovs <rvolosatovs@riseup.net>
These both fail to work with go1.13 due to test issues, downgrading to 1.12
The go sum db is a hosted service that appears to be generating a new inclusion proof each time this build is run (rather than using the one from the previous run). Since this ends up the module directory + thus hash, it's breaking deterministic builds. Co-authored-by: Roman Volosatovs <rvolosatovs@riseup.net>
It looks like go1.12 silently created the module, but go1.13 does not.
1e2ee2a
to
8ff1865
Compare
Cherry-picked c00w@f49b872 and rebased on top of latest @kalbasit yes, didn't want things like #68135 (comment) happen again |
@GrahamcOfBorg build gcsfuse jx pet |
Motivation for this change
Upstream update
Seems like progress on #68101 stalled for now, meanwhile I already have a working Go 1.13 derivation, which I have been successfully using for
1.5 working days2 weeksa while.I did not use a function for skipping tests like @adisbladis suggested and implemented in https://github.com/adisbladis/nixpkgs/tree/go_1_13, IMO this is out of scope of this PR - consistency is more important here.
I think stylistic/organizational changes belong in #35381
Packages still broken(there might be more):deepinThings done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)Notify maintainers
cc @cstrahan @orivej @velovix @Mic92 @kalbasit