Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Staging next that includes gcc8 #68244

Merged
merged 178 commits into from Sep 9, 2019
Merged

Staging next that includes gcc8 #68244

merged 178 commits into from Sep 9, 2019

Conversation

FRidh
Copy link
Member

@FRidh FRidh commented Sep 7, 2019

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @

globin and others added 30 commits May 4, 2018 18:47
Added the `-Wno-error=array-bounds` flag. Fixes #40213.
systemd: suppress certain warnings to compile under gcc8
This test is broken because gcc8.x86_64-darwin is broken. Please add
the test back in once we have fixed it!

Job: https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/trunk/gcc8.x86_64-darwin
Issue: #40038
gcc,gcc8: {revert gcc to gcc7, mark gcc8 as broken} on Darwin
llvm6: default to gcc7 instead of gcc8
iasl: 2018031 -> 20180508,  temporary fix for upstream issue #387
* elfutils: add patch that fixes compilation under gcc8

* elfutils: follow advice from @jtojnar
Broke xen and virtualbox.
This reverts commit d2f2132.
@FRidh
Copy link
Member Author

FRidh commented Sep 8, 2019

Maybe gcc8 got force-pushed removing it

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

vcunat commented Sep 8, 2019

No, see comments on #63132

@FRidh
Copy link
Member Author

FRidh commented Sep 8, 2019

@vcunat will you merge gcc-8 or shall I?

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

vcunat commented Sep 8, 2019

I can't make it today.

Earlier the gcc8 branch was merged instead of the gcc-8 branch (note the dash)...
@FRidh
Copy link
Member Author

FRidh commented Sep 8, 2019

OK. Now gcc-8 is in (5f4734b).

@andir
Copy link
Member

andir commented Sep 8, 2019

Would you consider picking #68096 for this iteration of staging next as well? It seems to be fairly low impact on the overall systems besides the extra rebuilds. Having this through staging would help us having it accepted for 19.09.

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

vcunat commented Sep 8, 2019

Oh, I wondered if this release should only get one large feature merged on the last day (which is past the planned fork-off date), but apparently we end up the same on every release :-)

@ofborg ofborg bot added the 6.topic: ruby label Sep 8, 2019
The build was fixed in two ways, by both this patch and a substitution.
Let's keep the substitition instead of the patch as the patches may disappear.

This reverts commit ccc8c73.
@FRidh
Copy link
Member Author

FRidh commented Sep 8, 2019

proposed eval fix #68324

@FRidh FRidh mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2019
10 tasks
This was present in the gcc-8 branch but got removed in the merge.
@nh2
Copy link
Contributor

nh2 commented Oct 21, 2019

It seems this merge broke building my builds with musl (due to a new [-Werror=attribute-alias] error appearing when glibc is being built with musl):

nh2/static-haskell-nix#56

nh2 added a commit to nh2/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2019
See

* NixOS#68244 (comment)
* nh2/static-haskell-nix#56

This commit takes care to not change the derivation for non-musl builds.
@nh2 nh2 mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2019
10 tasks
@nh2
Copy link
Contributor

nh2 commented Oct 21, 2019

It seems this merge broke building my builds with musl

PR to fix it: #71480

nh2 added a commit to nh2/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2019
GCC 8 introduced new warnings that were picked up by -Werror;
this commit makes them non-errors until fixed upstream.

See

* NixOS#68244 (comment)
* nh2/static-haskell-nix#56

This commit takes care to not change the derivation for non-musl builds.
dtzWill pushed a commit to dtzWill/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2020
GCC 8 introduced new warnings that were picked up by -Werror;
this commit makes them non-errors until fixed upstream.

See

* NixOS#68244 (comment)
* nh2/static-haskell-nix#56

This commit takes care to not change the derivation for non-musl builds.

(cherry picked from commit 08ec575)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet