Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

iproute: 5.1.0 -> 5.2.0 #64454

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 10, 2019
Merged

iproute: 5.1.0 -> 5.2.0 #64454

merged 1 commit into from Jul 10, 2019

Conversation

primeos
Copy link
Member

@primeos primeos commented Jul 8, 2019

"Not a lot of big new features in this release. Just the usual array of
small fixes across the board." 0

File changes:
None

nix path-info -S:
5.1.0 46637048
5.2.0 46627312

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

WIP as the release is tagged as "vv5.2.0" and not "v5.2.0" (I've notified the maintainer) and might be re-tagged.

"Not a lot of big new features in this release. Just the usual array of
small fixes across the board." [0]

File changes:
None

nix path-info -S:
5.1.0 46637048
5.2.0 46627312

[0]: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg584562.html
Copy link
Contributor

@jonringer jonringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After 2 days, my nix-review finally finished. A lot of the failed builds seem to be broken on master and likely to be false regressions.

I don't have enough willpower to determine if they are regressions :).

Nix-review output
[4696 built (20 failed), 3468 copied (2 failed) (23941.7 MiB), 13810.8 MiB DL]
error: build of '/nix/store/mb2dygflywgl6ypydf6rfp77f1vajvxl-env.drv' failed
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/64454
19 package are marked as broken and were skipped:
chronos gimpPlugins.focusblur gimpPlugins.texturize gnomeExtensions.system-monitor openmodelica python37Packages.cntk uzbl vimprobable2-unwrapped xenPackages.xen_4_5-light xenPackages.xen_4_5-slim xenPackages.xen_4_5-vanilla xfce.xfce4-dict-plugin xfce.xfce4-notes-plugin xfce.xfce4_dict_plugin xfce.xfce4_notes_plugin xfce4-12.xfce4-dict-plugin xfce4-12.xfce4-notes-plugin xfce4-12.xfce4_dict_plugin xfce4-12.xfce4_notes_plugin

67 package failed to build:
Sylk beegfs cntk discover flatpak flatpak-builder gimp-with-plugins gimpPlugins.gimplensfun gimpPlugins.ufraw gnome-builder gnome3.gnome-boxes gnome3.gnome-contacts gnome3.gnome-software shotwell ike kmymoney libguestfs libguestfs-with-appliance libsForQt511.khotkeys libvirt-glib libvmi lutris memtest86-efi minishift python27Packages.baselines python27Packages.cntk python27Packages.dask-jobqueue python27Packages.dask-mpi python27Packages.distributed python27Packages.guestfs python27Packages.neurotools python27Packages.streamz python37Packages.baselines python37Packages.dask-jobqueue python37Packages.dask-mpi python37Packages.dask-xgboost python37Packages.dftfit python37Packages.distributed python37Packages.guestfs python37Packages.lammps-cython python37Packages.streamz qemu_xen qemu_xen-light qemu_xen_4_10 qemu_xen_4_10-light quodlibet quodlibet-full quodlibet-without-gst-plugins quodlibet-xine quodlibet-xine-full qutebrowser rednotebook spark ufraw vagrant virt-viewer virtinst virtmanager xdg-desktop-portal xdg-desktop-portal-gtk xen xen-light xen-slim xen_4_10-light xen_4_10-slim xen_4_10 xfce.xfce4-vala-panel-appmenu-plugin

@primeos
Copy link
Member Author

primeos commented Jul 10, 2019

I did perform a few manual and automatic tests - this update should be fine :)

@jonringer Thanks :) That was probably a bit overkill but it never hurts. And yes, these packages are most likely false positives that where already broken before.

@primeos primeos merged commit 0209e77 into NixOS:staging Jul 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants