Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

dbeaver: 6.1.0 -> 6.1.2 #64480

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

dbeaver: 6.1.0 -> 6.1.2 #64480

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dtzWill
Copy link
Member

@dtzWill dtzWill commented Jul 9, 2019

Motivation for this change

https://dbeaver.io/2019/07/07/dbeaver-6-1-2/

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from samueldr July 9, 2019 10:40
@samueldr
Copy link
Member

@dtzWill are you a dbeaver user? I'm asking since I'm not going to be using it much coming soon, meaning that I won't be a good maintainer™ for it.

Want to add yourself to the maintainers list?

@samueldr samueldr mentioned this pull request Jul 27, 2019
Merged
10 tasks
@samueldr
Copy link
Member

Superceded by #65455.

@samueldr samueldr closed this Jul 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@samueldr samueldr Awaiting requested review from samueldr

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@dtzWill @samueldr