purescript: fix purescript derivation using easy-purescript-nix #57927
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
For the past couple of years, there has continued to be problems with having the PureScript compiler on nixpkgs building from Haskell packages it is not built against in its actual development and release. We have seen this issue come up multiple times here on nixpkgs, but this also causes numerous issues to be filed against the PureScript compiler repository. One example of an exchange that has occurred multiple times in the past: NixOS#53597 purescript/purescript#3571. As noted, the PureScript compiler is not on Stackage because it is not meant to be used as a library, and it does not update itself to the latest LTS and cut releases to match LTS releases. Instead, I have begun maintaining my own derivation for the PureScript compiler (among other tools) in a small project here: https://github.com/justinwoo/easy-purescript-nix. Within are other reference and derivations for other tools commonly used in the PureScript ecosystem, updated to their respective newest releases. These derivations use the same releases that other Linux and OSX users use, along with the standard application of patchELF to provide for runtime dependencies such as zlib, gmp, and ncurses5. These derivations are now used by a variety of NixOS, non-NixOS Linux, and OSX users. This commit then consumes the easy-purescript-nix derivation for the PureScript compiler and provides it in all-packages for consumption.
grahamc
reviewed
Mar 20, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you so much! I left quite a bit of suggested changes, but really they were almost entirely dropping pkgs. off dependencies.
The code looks good. The formatting is not quite consistent with the rest of nixpkgs, but it isn't a very long package and the formatting isn't bad.
Thank you for the second commit you already made -- inlining the expression, that definitely is important for inclusion as we don't support importing code which we fetched.
Co-Authored-By: justinwoo <moomoowoo@gmail.com>
grahamc
reviewed
Mar 20, 2019
Co-Authored-By: justinwoo <moomoowoo@gmail.com>
grahamc
reviewed
Mar 20, 2019
Co-Authored-By: justinwoo <moomoowoo@gmail.com>
|
OK Looks like we have a slight backlog in our build queue but: @GrahamcOfBorg build purescript |
GrahamcOfBorg
added
11.by: package-maintainer
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10
and removed
10.rebuild-darwin: 0
labels
|
Looks like everything went through except for the unsupported aarch64 |
|
Thank you! |
|
Thanks!! |
3 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation for this change
For the past couple of years, there has continued to be problems with having the PureScript compiler on nixpkgs building from Haskell packages it is not built against in its actual development and release. We have seen this issue come up multiple times here on nixpkgs, but this also causes numerous issues to be filed against the PureScript compiler repository. One example of an exchange that has occurred multiple times in the past: #53597 purescript/purescript#3571. As noted, the PureScript compiler is not on Stackage because it is not meant to be used as a library, and it does not update itself to the latest LTS and cut releases to match LTS releases.
Instead, I have begun maintaining my own derivation for the PureScript compiler (among other tools) in a small project here: https://github.com/justinwoo/easy-purescript-nix. Within are other reference and derivations for other tools commonly used in the PureScript ecosystem, updated to their respective newest releases. These derivations use the same releases that other Linux and OSX users use, along with the standard application of patchELF to provide for runtime dependencies such as zlib, gmp, and ncurses5. These derivations are now used by a variety of NixOS, non-NixOS Linux, and OSX users.
This commit then consumes the easy-purescript-nix derivation for the PureScript compiler and provides it in all-packages for consumption.
Things done
sandboxinnix.confon non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"./result/bin/)nix path-info -Sbefore and after)