New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
llvmPackages_8: rc5 -> 8.0.0 release! #57970
Conversation
pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix
Outdated
@@ -6899,7 +6900,7 @@ in | |||
|
|||
crossLibcStdenv = overrideCC stdenv | |||
(if stdenv.targetPlatform.useLLVM or false | |||
then buildPackages.llvmPackages_7.lldClangNoLibc | |||
then buildPackages.llvmPackages_8.lldClangNoLibc |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think a version makes sense here? Not sure how to handle it, but I would prefer if just used the "stable" llvmPackages. I guess we can do that later once everything is on llvm 8.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's to be as close to gcc as possible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(dropping this change, can revisit later as you say :))
Motivation for this change
Released!
http://releases.llvm.org/
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-announce/2019-March/000082.html
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)Various llvm/clang users may wish to upgrade,
but there are many so leaving them as-is for now.
Still building some variants, but will be done in a few...