Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wtfutil: init at 0.19.1 #66695

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

wtfutil: init at 0.19.1 #66695

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

yrashk
Copy link
Contributor

@yrashk yrashk commented Aug 15, 2019

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Copy link
Contributor

@jonringer jonringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nix-review passes on NixOS
Diff LGTM (But also not super familiar with Go packaging)
binary works
leaf package

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/66695
1 package were build:
wtfutil

Copy link
Contributor

@marsam marsam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's already packaged as wtf

@yrashk
Copy link
Contributor Author

yrashk commented Aug 16, 2019

Moved to #66700

@yrashk yrashk closed this Aug 16, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants