Skip to content

vulnix: 1.8.1 -> 1.8.2 #63310

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2019
Merged

vulnix: 1.8.1 -> 1.8.2 #63310

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2019
+2 −2

Conversation

ckauhaus
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation for this change

New bugfix release out.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions (Ubuntu)
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size -> negligible
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Sorry, something went wrong.

@ofborg ofborg bot added 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Jun 17, 2019
@srhb srhb merged commit 8f56d3e into NixOS:master Jun 25, 2019
@ckauhaus ckauhaus deleted the vulnix-1.8.2 branch June 25, 2019 15:27
@ckauhaus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@ckauhaus @srhb