Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

localstack: init at 0.9.6 #64760

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

localstack: init at 0.9.6 #64760

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mogorman
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation for this change

I wanted to play with localstack. others do to #50445

this is still a wip but thought id post here if others wanted to play while i get it working

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Copy link
Contributor

@jonringer jonringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If some of the packages have very specific version needs, I would first:

  • see if the package is following a version scheme such as semver so that you can widen the allowable range to include what the latest is.
  • if it's mutually exclusive (such as a different major version with breaking changes), then I would bring in the whole nix expression under that directory.
    • E.g you need pyyaml 3.13, then there would be a python-modules/awscli/pyyaml_3.nix that would include the expression to make that package.
  • Or if the package is commonly used at a previous version such as pytest_4, then just add it to the top level with the version (E.g pytest_4)

pinning a lot of specific versions will make it really hard to maintain

@mogorman
Copy link
Contributor Author

ya i saw the right way to do it halfway through. will fix more of that later. im more caught on, how to run npm install as post install step.

Copy link
Member

@FRidh FRidh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • All the buildInputs need to be checked because most are incorrect.
  • Tests!

}:

let
py = python.override {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No overrides in python-packages.nix.

{ stdenv, python }:


let
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No overrides in python-packages.nix.

@FRidh
Copy link
Member

FRidh commented Jul 15, 2019

ya i saw the right way to do it halfway through. will fix more of that later. im more caught on, how to run npm install as post install step.

Don't. You can probably symlink to a package in nodePackages.

@CMCDragonkai
Copy link
Member

What's the status of this?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 18, 2020

Hello, I'm a bot and I thank you in the name of the community for your contributions.

Nixpkgs is a busy repository, and unfortunately sometimes PRs get left behind for too long. Nevertheless, we'd like to help committers reach the PRs that are still important. This PR has had no activity for 180 days, and so I marked it as stale, but you can rest assured it will never be closed by a non-human.

If this is still important to you and you'd like to remove the stale label, we ask that you leave a comment. Your comment can be as simple as "still important to me". But there's a bit more you can do:

If you received an approval by an unprivileged maintainer and you are just waiting for a merge, you can @ mention someone with merge permissions and ask them to help. You might be able to find someone relevant by using Git blame on the relevant files, or via GitHub's web interface. You can see if someone's a member of the nixpkgs-committers team, by hovering with the mouse over their username on the web interface, or by searching them directly on the list.

If your PR wasn't reviewed at all, it might help to find someone who's perhaps a user of the package or module you are changing, or alternatively, ask once more for a review by the maintainer of the package/module this is about. If you don't know any, you can use Git blame on the relevant files, or GitHub's web interface to find someone who touched the relevant files in the past.

If your PR has had reviews and nevertheless got stale, make sure you've responded to all of the reviewer's requests / questions. Usually when PR authors show responsibility and dedication, reviewers (privileged or not) show dedication as well. If you've pushed a change, it's possible the reviewer wasn't notified about your push via email, so you can always officially request them for a review, or just @ mention them and say you've addressed their comments.

Lastly, you can always ask for help at our Discourse Forum, or more specifically, at this thread or at #nixos' IRC channel.

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jul 18, 2020
@mogorman
Copy link
Contributor Author

dont have time to clean this up

@mogorman mogorman closed this Jul 18, 2020
@CMCDragonkai
Copy link
Member

Someone else can take over this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2.status: merge conflict 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md 6.topic: python
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants