Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

gpgme: 1.12.0 -> 1.13.0 #58387

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

gpgme: 1.12.0 -> 1.13.0 #58387

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

primeos
Copy link
Member

@primeos primeos commented Mar 26, 2019

Upstream release information: https://dev.gnupg.org/T4376

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@primeos primeos self-assigned this Mar 26, 2019
@dtzWill
Copy link
Member

dtzWill commented Mar 26, 2019

Oops, #58388 . I'm happy closing mine in favor of this but should drop autoreconfHook and such in order to fix version (try gpgme-config --version) which in turn fixes build w/seahorse.

@primeos
Copy link
Member Author

primeos commented Mar 26, 2019

@dtzWill we can also take your PR then (also +1 for dropping git). But we should probably try to avoid this duplication of work in the future :o :D

Feel free to skip all of my packages (I'm normally not missing any updates - at least as long as my notifications work) or to replace me as maintainer (if you'd like to maintain gpgme).
Anyway, thanks for helping to keep everything up-to-date :) Unfortunately we have quite a lot of unmaintained packages :o (in general we should probably try to identify these and focus on them - maybe ping the maintaineres and remove them if they don't respond or are not interested anymore).

@primeos primeos closed this Mar 26, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Fuuzetsu Fuuzetsu Awaiting requested review from Fuuzetsu

Assignees

@primeos primeos

Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 11-100 10.rebuild-linux: 101-500 11.by: package-maintainer
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@primeos @dtzWill @GrahamcOfBorg