Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

webkitgtk: 2.24.1 -> 2.24.2 #62141

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

webkitgtk: 2.24.1 -> 2.24.2 #62141

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hedning
Copy link
Contributor

@hedning hedning commented May 28, 2019

https://webkitgtk.org/2019/05/17/webkitgtk2.24.2-released.html

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@FRidh
Copy link
Member

FRidh commented May 28, 2019

Duplicate of #61641

@FRidh FRidh marked this as a duplicate of #61641 May 28, 2019
@FRidh FRidh closed this May 28, 2019
@hedning
Copy link
Contributor Author

hedning commented May 28, 2019

Cheers, we usually send webkitgtk to master, so I forgot to check staging.

@hedning hedning deleted the webkit-2.24.2 branch October 15, 2019 11:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 101-500
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@hedning @FRidh