cc @worldofpeace

note ofborg will probably fail anyway, since it first checks master.

Could we manually edit the file? I'm guessing something's up with the generation.
If not revert is fine, I'd expect @peti to respond accordingly.

cc @infinisil

Its most likely c4d3214 in particular, so maybe its enough to revert that. But that could lead to regressions. Seems safest to revert completely until @peti can look into it.

I'll take a look to see if it's easily fixable

Ah, the problem is that while @peti fixed the package being broken with c4d3214, he didn't remove hpack from the list of packages marked as broken, meaning when hackage-packages.nix was regenerated, it still ended up being marked as broken

I can fix this manually, PR(s) incoming in a bit

Superseded by #66495.