-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 511
Inequality constraints #81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
In brief, SolveSpace's solver could be hacked to kind of support inequalities, but it was never made for that. Some earlier threads: http://solvespace.com/forum.pl?action=viewthread&parent=211 |
Also, some time its needed prevent to change vector (for example, "line could be enlarged only from start point in left direction, and not in reverse") |
@jwesthues, This actually was made and works fine. I even don't see any "hacks" in this solution, just the pure mathematics :) |
Are they any plans to bring this into the core? I would love this feature. |
No immediate plans, other tasks have a higher priority. |
@jwesthues & @Evil-Spirit, so if it work in test, why not implemented yet? |
@jwesthues, |
|
Evil-Spirit, you are the man! Do not forget call @probonopd to this party too! |
Can you please merge this? Looks very nice! |
Yeah, it's in my review queue. I did not forget about this patch though. |
Add constraint that give a way set parametre as ≤ or ≥ to inserted value.
Its very important for kinematic schemes, assembled models and mechanism design.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: