As a track convener comparing several independently-made abstract reviews with the other fellow reviewers in a conference track,

I would like to have a possibility to enter a common decision representing all the reviewers into some sort of "group decision" box,

so that conference chairs have an easy way to see the overall decision of track conveners and wouldn't have to rely on one particular person serving as a proxy with this person amending his/her prior individual reviews to fit the new mutual group decision.

See also #3973 for the nice display of the mutual group decision statistics as to how many abstracts are accepted, rejected, proposed for merge, etc.

(Motivated by CHEP track reviewing and convening.)