-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.5k
nixos/nginx: Enable TLS 1.3 support #56233
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This will allow us to enable TLSv1.3
fa7d823
to
3cedb8c
Compare
@@ -645,6 +645,9 @@ | |||
This may break some older applications that still rely on those symbols. | |||
An upgrade guide can be found <link xlink:href="https://www.open-mpi.org/faq/?category=mpi-removed">here</link>. | |||
</para> | |||
<para> | |||
The nginx now relies on OpenSSL 1.1 and supports TLS 1.3 by default. You can change the supported protocols using <xref linkend="opt-services.nginx.sslProtocols"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wordsmithing: "The nginx package now requires OpenSSL, and supports TLS 1.3 by default."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It always required OpenSSL, we just switched from 1.0 to 1.1 branch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was more referring to the lack of the word "package" to qualify "nginx" to help it read easier, and placing emphasis on the "requirement" part. Yes, the full text should be:
The nginx package now requires OpenSSL 1.1, and supports TLS 1.3 by default.
LGTM, test deployed to a server and works as expected! Thanks! :) |
3cedb8c
to
b3fbb04
Compare
I've taken the liberty of rephrasing the release notes documentation myself so we can get this in today before the branch-off. A quick review would be appreciated! |
b3fbb04
to
f93ff28
Compare
Argh, my mistake. New attempt here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. The rephrasing also seems good.
@lheckemann can you (back)port this to |
Done! Thanks for the pointer. |
Uhm… did commit 051e852 (actually build nginx with |
😨 oops. Good catch, fixed! |
Motivation for this change
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)