Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pytrainer: 1.12.1 → 2.0.0 #53125

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

jtojnar
Copy link
Contributor

@jtojnar jtojnar commented Dec 31, 2018

Motivation for this change

Finally GTK 3 support #18559

There are still some rough edges, which I reported upstream; also created a patch for modern webkitgtk support pytrainer/pytrainer#174

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@rycee
Copy link
Member

rycee commented Jul 15, 2019

Ah, I was just working on upgrading to 2.0.0 yesterday. I'll have a look at this, I think your setup is nicer. Thanks!

@jtojnar jtojnar changed the title pytrainer: 1.12.1 → 2.0.0rc1 pytrainer: 1.12.1 → 2.0.0 Jul 16, 2019
@rycee
Copy link
Member

rycee commented Jul 17, 2019

Thanks for the update, I've tried it and everything seems to work great! Rebased to master in 99e72dc.

@rycee rycee closed this Jul 17, 2019
@jtojnar jtojnar deleted the pytrainer-2 branch July 17, 2019 07:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants