Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nixos/prosody: add authentication option (fixes #53134) #53308

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from
Closed

nixos/prosody: add authentication option (fixes #53134) #53308

wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Jan 3, 2019

Motivation for this change
Passwords should not be stored in plain text by default. On existing
installations the next time a users user accounts will automatically
be upgraded from plain to hashed one-by-one as they log in.
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jan 26, 2019

CC @Mic92

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Feb 22, 2019

Any news?

@aanderse
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 what is required for further action on this PR from your perspective?

@ghost ghost closed this May 4, 2019
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented May 6, 2019

I have no idea when and why I closed this, was not intended
It doesn't let me reopen the PR for some reason, so I'll create a new one.

@alyssais
Copy link
Member

alyssais commented May 6, 2019

Deleted the branch, perhaps?

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants