Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ima-evm-utils: 1.0.0 -> 1.1 and fix build #57287

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 15, 2019
Merged

ima-evm-utils: 1.0.0 -> 1.1 and fix build #57287

merged 2 commits into from Mar 15, 2019

Conversation

pSub
Copy link
Member

@pSub pSub commented Mar 10, 2019 •
edited

Motivation for this change

Update to latest version and apply upstream patch for attr-2.4.48 compatibility (see #53716).

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@pSub
Copy link
Member Author

pSub commented Mar 10, 2019

@GrahamcOfBorg eval

@pSub
Copy link
Member Author

pSub commented Mar 10, 2019

@GrahamcOfBorg build ima-evm-utils

@pSub pSub merged commit 4a51bcf into master Mar 15, 2019
@pSub pSub deleted the update-fix-ima-evm-utils branch March 15, 2019 07:59
@hedning hedning mentioned this pull request Mar 16, 2019
Closed
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@pSub @GrahamcOfBorg