Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

erlangR21: 21.2 -> 21.2.3 #53964

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 17, 2019
Merged

erlangR21: 21.2 -> 21.2.3 #53964

merged 1 commit into from Jan 17, 2019

Conversation

ejpcmac
Copy link
Contributor

@ejpcmac ejpcmac commented Jan 14, 2019 •
edited

Motivation for this change

A new version is available.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@hedning
Copy link
Contributor

hedning commented Jan 15, 2019

@GrahamcOfBorg build erlangR21

@ejpcmac
Copy link
Contributor Author

ejpcmac commented Jan 17, 2019

Wait, Erlang/OTP 21.2.3 is out, I’ll update my PR.

@ejpcmac ejpcmac changed the title erlangR21: 21.2 -> 21.2.2 erlangR21: 21.2 -> 21.2.3 Jan 17, 2019
@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit 088cb13 into NixOS:master Jan 17, 2019
@ejpcmac ejpcmac deleted the update-erlangR21 branch January 17, 2019 12:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
6.topic: erlang 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@ejpcmac @hedning @Mic92 @GrahamcOfBorg