New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
minetime: init at 1.4.12 #56259
minetime: init at 1.4.12 #56259
Conversation
@@ -46,17 +46,16 @@ rec { | |||
cd $APPDIR | |||
exec ./AppRun "$@" | |||
''; | |||
}); | |||
} // (builtins.removeAttrs args [ "name" "src" "extraPkgs" ])); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would with builtins; attrNames (functionArgs wrapAppImage)
be preferable here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, neat! I think so, no need to maintain two lists and perhaps is clearer re:intent.
f63a89c
to
056d827
Compare
re:third point maybe that isn't needed since |
(added commit removing the inherit in both variants, FWIW) |
@GrahamcOfBorg eval |
Look okay re:appimagetools changes, @tilpner ? :) |
Thanks for adding this one @dtzWill. Really looking forward to it getting merged :) |
Oh, sorry, I forgot about this one. Yes, looks fine! |
It's up to 1.4.12 fwiw, I have that commit ready but can submit in a follow-up :). But it's just a bump and hashfix happily. |
@GrahamcOfBorg eval |
I had one remaining suspicion about at which levels This is because defaults are only bound locally, the captured args don't have them.
To fix this, move the defaulting of |
Locally merging the linked standardnotes PR results in a tree that evaluates |
I'm not sure. I checked out standardnotes-appimagetools and picked all Appimage-related commits ( I think 58ce19e097a9bc099bf86b45ca9317fddb59ccd0 is the one breaking it, not fixing it.
|
acf3067
to
fc6c5fd
Compare
@GrahamcOfBorg build minetime standardnotes joplin-desktop |
Well regardless rebase + some new changes and all is well re:eval. \o/ Look good, @tilpner ? :) |
Motivation for this change
Builds on #54693, making small changes for adding more attributes.
Open to suggestions for better approach, but this works well for me :).
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)