Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

esphome: 1.10.1 -> 1.11.1 #56225

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 24, 2019
Merged

esphome: 1.10.1 -> 1.11.1 #56225

merged 2 commits into from Feb 24, 2019

Conversation

dotlambda
Copy link
Member

@dotlambda dotlambda commented Feb 23, 2019 •
edited

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@dotlambda dotlambda changed the title esphome: 1.10.1 -> 1.11.0 esphome: 1.10.1 -> 1.11.1 Feb 24, 2019
@dotlambda
Copy link
Member Author

@GrahamcOfBorg build esphome python2.pkgs.ifaddr

@dotlambda dotlambda merged commit 6e5a66f into NixOS:master Feb 24, 2019
@dotlambda dotlambda deleted the esphome-1.11.0 branch January 17, 2024 05:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@FRidh FRidh Awaiting requested review from FRidh

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
6.topic: python 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@dotlambda @GrahamcOfBorg