Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ndppd module: refactor and fix #55122

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Feb 4, 2019
Merged

ndppd module: refactor and fix #55122

merged 5 commits into from Feb 4, 2019

Conversation

elseym
Copy link
Member

@elseym elseym commented Feb 3, 2019

Motivation for this change

implements more options for the ndppd module and marks the previous interface as 'soon to be removed' while keeping backward compatibility in order to keep config options closer to ndppd.conf syntax.

thanks to @fpletz for the test and the package fix :)

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@Ma27
Copy link
Member

Ma27 commented Feb 3, 2019

the change itself seems fine, I'll test it locally just to be sure, and check if we can easily backport this as discussed with you previously.

@GrahamcOfBorg test ndppd

@Ma27
Copy link
Member

Ma27 commented Feb 3, 2019

Merge/Test got delayed because of poor train wifi. I'll hope that I can finish this tonight :)

@Ma27 Ma27 merged commit 5a3a543 into NixOS:master Feb 4, 2019
@Ma27
Copy link
Member

Ma27 commented Feb 4, 2019

@elseym @fpletz thanks!

@Ma27
Copy link
Member

Ma27 commented Feb 4, 2019

As discussed yesterday, the module is actually backwards-compatible and is hence backportable. I confirmed this by building a simple NixOS VM network (as done in the test) and didn't encounter any behavioral differences after backporting the commits from this PR.

Now backported as 43d2810, b9d797f, 9617949, 38a9921

@fpletz
Copy link
Member

fpletz commented Feb 4, 2019

Awesome, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants