Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Range Safety Confirmation Dialog #993

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2019

Conversation

MikeOnTea
Copy link
Contributor

@MikeOnTea MikeOnTea commented Jan 19, 2019

image
Fixes #979 i think.

@pap1723 pap1723 merged commit ed56524 into KSP-RO:master Jan 19, 2019
pap1723 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2019
* Another fix to maintenance costs, changed first level pad to be lvl 1 instead of 0

* Fix copy-paste bug in RP0ThermoChanger

* Updated KCT Preset to Properly Support parts with Underscores

Also cleaned up the formatting a little bit.

* Updated Module Tags to provide information about Rollout Costs

The Module Tags we have are what "multiplies" the cost of the rollout costs to be more expensive based on the type of part. That information used to be hidden from the player. It is now displayed as part of the Module Tag Tooltip in the Right Click Menu.

* Very simple typo fix in Avionics.cfg

Very simple typo fix

* Updated the Avionics and Decoupler Module Tags

I had missed these with the earlier fixes. These provide more information to the player on where the rollout costs are coming from.

* Updated Capsules ECMS and Costs

Updated all of the First Three Levels of Capsules to balance the costs, apply ECM's and standardize the parts. Now there are discounts for unlocking other capsules in the same family.

Includes a typo fix on the Explorer 1 ECM's from @mattwrobel

* Moved Kerbalism config to RO where it belongs

* Added a tip about the Orbital Reentry contract

* Fix (?) non-reentry rated.

* Add ModuleNoEVA.

* Add Range Safety Confirmation Dialog (#993)

* Proc avionics fixes (#994)

* Rework proc avioncs tonnage slider

* Rework update handling

* Reset to 100 fix

* Fix avionics actions ignoring shutdown restriction, make them always assignable in the VAB

* Rebuilt RP0.dll with Recent Commits

Includes the commits for Proc Avionics fixes, Range Safety confirmation dialog, NoEVA Module, Non-Reentry Rated fixes and Module Tag updates with more information about rollout costs affects.

* Fix NoEVA to unlink and relink the airlock transform for the Portrait EVA button

* Use a hashset for NonReentryRated, fix one more param

* Recompile with higher floors for nonreentryrated parts

* Add No-EVA module to X-1 cockpit, Mercury, and Mk1 pod. (note this will be clobbered by the next partbrowser export, that's fine)

* Forgot to push the csproj when I added that module

* Tweak rollout costs, add resource support for part BP cost multipliers. Also fix file formatting.

* Increase rollout increase from human-rated to 2x from 1.5x.

* Adjusted Costs of SRB's

SRBs no longer have a 40% cost reduction, their costs are returned to full price, but they only have a 0.5 cost multipler for rollout costs.

All Solid Fuel costs have been reduced to 0.0 as they are already considered in the cost of the part

Baby Sergeants have had their per unit cost raised from 30 to 60 and the RN ones are now properly priced

* Tooling cost modifier disabled in sandbox.

* Change how solid propellants are made to cost nothing

* Correct price setting for MFT solids

* PartsBrowser: Added NoEVA module tag, consolidated and made adding new tags super simple (just add to module_tags.csv)

* Parts:  Added NoEVA tag to X-1 cockpits and mercury/mk1 pods

* Update .travis.yml

* Along with previous commit should help fix travis

Cleaned up references to RP-1 that should have remained RP-0.

* Update makeversion

Restored RP-1 references with proper RP-0 ones.
@MikeOnTea MikeOnTea deleted the rangeSafetyConfirm branch July 5, 2019 19:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants