Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

beamPackages.hex: 0.17.1 -> 0.19.0 #55712

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

beamPackages.hex: 0.17.1 -> 0.19.0 #55712

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cw789
Copy link
Contributor

@cw789 cw789 commented Feb 13, 2019

Motivation for this change

This is my first contribution but should be quite forward, as it's just a version upgrade.
If something is wrong with it or how it is done - please let me know.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@cw789
Copy link
Contributor Author

cw789 commented Feb 28, 2019

Can anybody help me to get this merged?
I've tried to build it on my notebook, but it was taking much too long (> 1h).
Is there something wrong or something I'm not aware of?

@cw789
Copy link
Contributor Author

cw789 commented Jun 19, 2019

Closed in favor of duplicate: #58343
But I'm still interested in any help to get this hex package update merged...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants