Give the top level scope a name to fix vcd file production #21
+1
−1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
At present the
root_fragment
in the pysimhierarchy
has an emptyscope=()
, and when this is added to the vcd file we get:i.e. the top-level module has no name. This breaks gtkwave somewhat as you can't re-select the top level after selecting a submodule:
This patch sets the
root_fragment
's scope to"top"
, producing a vcd with a useful hierarchy:I can't see an obvious way to get a more useful name than "top" for the root fragment, but if one exists that would be even better.