New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
libdigidoc: 3.10.1.1212 -> 3.10.4, libdigidocpp: 3.13.3.1365 -> 3.13.6, remove qdigidoc #42321
Conversation
Package fails to build and maintainer did not updated this package since two years.
@GrahamcOfBorg build libdigidocpp |
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: libdigidocpp Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: libdigidocpp Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: libdigidocpp Partial log (click to expand)
|
@@ -4650,7 +4650,6 @@ with pkgs; | |||
qastools = libsForQt5.callPackage ../tools/audio/qastools { }; | |||
|
|||
qesteidutil = libsForQt5.callPackage ../tools/security/qesteidutil { } ; | |||
qdigidoc = libsForQt5.callPackage ../tools/security/qdigidoc { } ; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's better to mark it as broken instead of removing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why should we spend time on evaluation of derivations that have not seen any updates since 2016? Also it removes a large patch from the channel.
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: libdigidoc, libdigidocpp Partial log (click to expand)
|
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: libdigidoc, libdigidocpp Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: libdigidoc, libdigidocpp Partial log (click to expand)
|
I'm interested in maintaining qdigidoc, I'll send a pull request with an update and maintainership claim soon. |
@yegortimoshenko any updates on this? |
Motivation for this change
Package were discovered as broken during a review of a different pull request.
qdigidoc is queued for removal unless an active maintainer is found: cc @jagajaga
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)