del mesa-darwin: fossil (2012 version) #43145
Conversation
|
You seem to have just removed the expression without removing the package calls. $ rg libGLDarwin
pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix
10888: libGL = libGLDarwinOr mesa_noglu.stubs;
10891: libGLU = libGLDarwinOr mesa_glu;
10897: libGLU_combined = libGLDarwinOr (buildEnv {
10904: libGL_driver = libGLDarwinOr mesa_drivers;
10908: libGLDarwin = callPackage ../development/libraries/mesa-darwin {
10914: libGLDarwinOr = alternative: if stdenv.isDarwin then libGLDarwin else alternative;Also I would like to hear from @cstrahan or someone if this relict is still needed. |
Anton-Latukha
force-pushed
the
just-drop-that-mesa-darwin
branch
from
61a771c
to
43aff19
Compare
Anton-Latukha
force-pushed
the
just-drop-that-mesa-darwin
branch
from
43aff19
to
f48bfc9
Compare
|
Yes we need to get latest mesa to build on macOS before we can start doing this. |
|
Please say more. |
Yes - the problem right now is that mesa-darwin is still used in a few places (mostly xorg stuff). It definitely should be removed because it is unmaintained & out of date but we don't have a good alternative yet. |
|
Ok. Than in fact I can avoid this versions situation.
|
|
Closed in favor of both: 1) #43378, 2) seems still used to some degree. |
Motivation for this change
Main point
(2018-06-29) v18.1.3 -
mesa(2012-10-24) v08.0.3 -
mesa-darwinI do
mesav18 work, andmesa-darwinv8 relies onmesaand creates conflicts during evaluation.Good point is - from 2012 to this date it was evaluating - that shows the stability achieved by the Nix approach.
###### Serious jokes
I really can not test
mesa-darwinv8, both because of architecture, and because it is mesa in 2012 edition style.I summon the @jtojnar - daedric prince! One of your spheres of influence is guiding forces to cleanse the old, so new comes to the world.
###### Fun time
I, not once, checked everything. Now is the only time I probably ever give myself that fun:
- [x] Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option
sandboxinnix.confon non-NixOS)- Built on platform(s)
_ - [x] NixOS_
_ - [x] macOS_
_ - [x] other Linux distributions_
- [x] Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
- [x] Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using
nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"- [x] Tested execution of all binary files (usually in
./result/bin/)- [x] Determined the impact on package closure size (by running
nix path-info -Sbefore and after)- [x] Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Yes! I did it! 8)
Seriously, it conflicts with
mesa.