New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pciutils: 3.6.0 -> 3.6.1 #43741
pciutils: 3.6.0 -> 3.6.1 #43741
Conversation
Semi-automatic update generated by https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/metapackage/pciutils/versions.
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: pciutils Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: pciutils Partial log (click to expand)
|
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: pciutils Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: pciutils Partial log (click to expand)
|
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: pciutils Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: pciutils Partial log (click to expand)
|
IIRC this minor bump is due to upstream incorporating the change we currently make in staging's postPatch ( #43267 ). Should remove the postPatch if so, and \o/ congrats thanks everyone :). |
Yes, I didn't test it (with musl), but it sounds OK, if our patch had worked. pciutils/pciutils@f15db375b85 I removed the |
Semi-automatic update generated by https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/metapackage/pciutils/versions.
meta.description for pciutils is: '"A collection of programs for inspecting and manipulating configuration of PCI devices"'.
Checks done (click to expand)
Test this build with Cachix (click to expand)
One time setup in nixpkgs Git checkout:
Test this build:
cc @vcunat for testing.