ufoai: 2.4 -> 2.5 #43270
Closed
ufoai: 2.4 -> 2.5 #43270
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add few more deps, set c++ standard to fix build.
|
Hmm looking around this looks a bit messier to package "properly" and instead of doing it badly for sake of shiny newest, let's preserve what we already have :). |
|
In case useful to anyone (perhaps myself) in the future, tagged some "WIP" commits building on this: https://github.com/dtzWill/nixpkgs/releases/tag/update%2Fufoai-2.5-wip |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add few more deps, set c++ standard to fix build.
2.5.0 was apparently released 2014-06-28,
so seems about time to update :).
https://ufoai.org/wiki/Changelog/2.5
sandboxinnix.confon non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"./result/bin/)nix path-info -Sbefore and after)Only tested launching, not familiar with game so someone else should
probably vet this a bit more thoroughly.
cc maintainer @viric