New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pari: 2.9.5 -> 2.11.0 #44129
pari: 2.9.5 -> 2.11.0 #44129
Conversation
@GrahamcOfBorg build giac |
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: giac Partial log (click to expand)
|
cc @symphorien |
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: giac Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: pari Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-darwin (full log) Attempted: pari Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: giac Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: pari Partial log (click to expand)
|
The pari update makes it necessary to disable a giac test that only fails because it directly tests the pari interface.
I've added a link to the report upstream. |
Success on x86_64-darwin (full log) Attempted: pari Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: pari Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: pari Partial log (click to expand)
|
@timokau I am still waiting for my giac forum account to be approved (I have requested it last year) so Apparently the forum is dead: https://xcas.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2071 |
At least the admin still posted there this month and somebody who is apparently more involved in giac development did report the bug for me: https://xcas.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=2102#p10326 So does this have your "LGTM" @symphorien? |
technically the test failure does not seem spurious, if my understanding is correct, so silencing it seems somewhat wrong. |
So I reread the tests and threads more carefully and the failure is indeed spurious. |
Yes its just testing an unused part of the pari interface and that interface changed a bit. Its not optimal to disable the entire test set, but I think it should be okay for one release (hoping that they fix it soon). Great! Can someone merge then? |
@symphorien in case you still want a forum account, this is relevant: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25567#comment:46 |
The pari update in #43924 breaks the giac test suite. Jeroen from sagemath analyzed that test failure here and determined that it doesn't actually make any difference to giac. So here I'm applying the upgrade and disabling the relevant test(-set).
Closes #43924. @FRidh
Motivation for this change
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)