Nixpkgs tests #125
Closed
Nixpkgs tests #125
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Ideally, we can scrap the |
|
@Profpatsch Well, that is a very long-term ideally. Right now ofBorg doesn't even build all the changed derivations themselves… |
|
Probably not a thing we should do unless nixpkgs supports it properly. |
|
Indeed, I had completely forgot this PR was still open, should have closed it when NixOS/nixpkgs#36842 stalled, sorry! :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
First draft of adding support for nixpkgs tests as per NixOS/nixpkgs#36842.
Builds upon #124 ; this is a completely untested PR, mostly there to illustrate addition of a new keyword.