Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ceph: fix build, 12.2.2 -> 12.2.7 #45645

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 26, 2018
Merged

ceph: fix build, 12.2.2 -> 12.2.7 #45645

merged 1 commit into from Aug 26, 2018

Conversation

xeji
Copy link
Contributor

@xeji xeji commented Aug 26, 2018

Motivation for this change

Since 772eef9, Boost doesn't support by python by default, which broke ceph. Also bump to 12.2.7, the latest release of ceph 12, which is still supported upstream.

Note that ceph 13 is out, and people are working on getting it into nixpkgs, see #42830.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@xeji
ceph: fix build, 12.2.2 -> 12.2.7
cd8bcb5 
Since 772eef9, Boost
doesn't support by python by default, which broke ceph.

Also bump to 12.2.7, the latest release of ceph 12.
@GrahamcOfBorg
Copy link

No attempt on aarch64-linux (full log)

The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on aarch64-linux: ceph

Partial log (click to expand)


a) For `nixos-rebuild` you can set
  { nixpkgs.config.allowUnsupportedSystem = true; }
in configuration.nix to override this.

b) For `nix-env`, `nix-build`, `nix-shell` or any other Nix command you can add
  { allowUnsupportedSystem = true; }
to ~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix.

@GrahamcOfBorg
Copy link

No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log)

The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: ceph

Partial log (click to expand)


a) For `nixos-rebuild` you can set
  { nixpkgs.config.allowUnsupportedSystem = true; }
in configuration.nix to override this.

b) For `nix-env`, `nix-build`, `nix-shell` or any other Nix command you can add
  { allowUnsupportedSystem = true; }
to ~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix.

@GrahamcOfBorg
Copy link

Timed out, unknown build status on x86_64-linux (full log)

Attempted: ceph

Partial log (click to expand)

[ 37%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/common-objs.dir/common/histogram.cc.o
[ 37%] Building CXX object src/mon/CMakeFiles/mon.dir/AuthMonitor.cc.o
[ 38%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/common-objs.dir/osd/osd_types.cc.o
[ 38%] Building CXX object src/mon/CMakeFiles/mon.dir/Elector.cc.o
[ 38%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/common-objs.dir/osd/OpRequest.cc.o
[ 38%] Building CXX object src/mon/CMakeFiles/mon.dir/HealthMonitor.cc.o
[ 38%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/common-objs.dir/common/blkdev.cc.o
[ 38%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/common-objs.dir/common/common_init.cc.o
building of '/nix/store/i0cir1mh7bmvddyqb39rlqhb68iw6gkj-ceph-12.2.7.drv' timed out after 1800 seconds
error: build of '/nix/store/i0cir1mh7bmvddyqb39rlqhb68iw6gkj-ceph-12.2.7.drv' failed

@xeji
Copy link
Contributor Author

xeji commented Aug 26, 2018

It's a long build, likely to time out on ofborg.
Builds locally on x86_64-linux and passes nixos/tests/ceph.

@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit 110b7b2 into NixOS:master Aug 26, 2018
@xeji xeji deleted the p/ceph branch August 26, 2018 12:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@xeji @GrahamcOfBorg @Mic92