Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

parmetis: init at 4.0.3 #46615

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 13, 2018
Merged

parmetis: init at 4.0.3 #46615

merged 1 commit into from Sep 13, 2018

Conversation

costrouc
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

Parallel implementation of metis. Useful for petsc package #28368 compilation

Things done

parmetis: init at 4.0.3

  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

homepage = http://glaros.dtc.umn.edu/gkhome/metis/parmetis/overview;
platforms = stdenv.lib.platforms.all;
license = licenses.cc-by-nc-sa-20;
maintainers = [ maintainers.costrouc ];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please add meta.platforms.

@costrouc
Copy link
Member Author

platforms.all has been added and in current pull request.

@xeji
Copy link
Contributor

xeji commented Sep 13, 2018

@GrahamcOfBorg build parmetis

@GrahamcOfBorg
Copy link

No attempt on x86_64-linux (full log)

The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-linux: parmetis

Partial log (click to expand)


a) For `nixos-rebuild` you can set
  { nixpkgs.config.allowUnfree = true; }
in configuration.nix to override this.

b) For `nix-env`, `nix-build`, `nix-shell` or any other Nix command you can add
  { allowUnfree = true; }
to ~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix.


@GrahamcOfBorg
Copy link

No attempt on aarch64-linux (full log)

The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on aarch64-linux: parmetis

Partial log (click to expand)


a) For `nixos-rebuild` you can set
  { nixpkgs.config.allowUnfree = true; }
in configuration.nix to override this.

b) For `nix-env`, `nix-build`, `nix-shell` or any other Nix command you can add
  { allowUnfree = true; }
to ~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix.


@GrahamcOfBorg
Copy link

No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log)

The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: parmetis

Partial log (click to expand)


a) For `nixos-rebuild` you can set
  { nixpkgs.config.allowUnfree = true; }
in configuration.nix to override this.

b) For `nix-env`, `nix-build`, `nix-shell` or any other Nix command you can add
  { allowUnfree = true; }
to ~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix.


@xeji
Copy link
Contributor

xeji commented Sep 13, 2018

Unfree package, build checked locally on x86_64-linux.

@costrouc
Copy link
Member Author

parmetis is free to use as long as it is non commercial. I tried to find the "closest" license I could find.

http://glaros.dtc.umn.edu/gkhome/metis/parmetis/download

ParMETIS is copyrighted by the Regents of the University of Minnesota. It can be freely used for educational and research purposes by non-profit institutions and US government agencies only. Other organizations are allowed to use ParMETIS only for evaluation purposes, and any further uses will require prior approval. The software may not be sold or redistributed without prior approval. One may make copies of the software for their use provided that the copies, are not sold or distributed, are used under the same terms and conditions.

@xeji xeji merged commit 3c2a747 into NixOS:master Sep 13, 2018
@xeji
Copy link
Contributor

xeji commented Sep 13, 2018

This doesn't really look like a creative commons license, I think a generic licenses.unfree fits better. If you agree I will change that directly without a PR.

@costrouc
Copy link
Member Author

I agree that is a better fit. Thanks!

@xeji
Copy link
Contributor

xeji commented Sep 13, 2018

license changed in 79d9145

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants