Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

nixos/ibus: detail workaround for issue #11558 #42588

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 27, 2018
Merged

nixos/ibus: detail workaround for issue #11558 #42588

merged 1 commit into from Jun 27, 2018

Conversation

laMudri
Copy link
Contributor

@laMudri laMudri commented Jun 25, 2018

Motivation for this change

Translation of #11558 (comment) into the manual.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

cc @Profpatsch

@Profpatsch
Copy link
Member

I’d add a note that this should only happen with programs installed via nix-env.

@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Jun 27, 2018 •
edited

Or in a nix-shell or when channels are mixed or cachix is used or when applications from a system profile interferes with a user system profile... I think we can keep it as it is.

@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit 9ae531e into NixOS:master Jun 27, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
6.topic: nixos 8.has: module (update) 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@laMudri @Profpatsch @Mic92 @GrahamcOfBorg