Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ghc: do not use ld.gold with musl libc #84670 #84741

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 9, 2020

Conversation

adamse
Copy link
Contributor

@adamse adamse commented Apr 8, 2020

Motivation for this change

Potential workaround for #84670.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@adamse adamse changed the title haskell: do not use ld.gold with musl libc #84670 ghc: do not use ld.gold with musl libc #84670 Apr 8, 2020
@cdepillabout
Copy link
Member

@GrahamcOfBorg build pkgsMusl.ghc

@cdepillabout
Copy link
Member

Looks like ofborg might have timed out.

@adamse Thanks for fixing this.

And thanks to @nh2 and @utdemir for reporting this.

@domenkozar
Copy link
Member

I think we also need to backport to 20.03

@domenkozar
Copy link
Member

Nitpick: would be nice to add a comment why musl is disabled

@adamse
Copy link
Contributor Author

adamse commented Apr 9, 2020

Added a comment in #84809

@nh2
Copy link
Contributor

nh2 commented Jul 23, 2020

Does this need a 20.03 backport still?

@nh2
Copy link
Contributor

nh2 commented Jul 23, 2020

Does this need a 20.30 backport still?

Here: #93687

@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2020
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants