You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In particular, Vivado errors on explicit BUFH -> PS7 placement. I've confirmed that Vivado will take the axi_regs_zybo design, and route the design the same way as current master symbiflow-arch-defs. However when Vivado is given the same design with an explicit BUFH, Vivado generates an error because of the BUFH -> PS7 placement. The likely solution is to not emit explicit BUFH instances, but instead emit route through the BUFH with FIXED_ROUTE's. This might be tricky, and is not the most important thing to work on right now.
For now, I recommend we disable the DIFF_FASM test for axi_regs_zybo until this is fixed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In particular, Vivado errors on explicit BUFH -> PS7 placement. I've confirmed that Vivado will take the
axi_regs_zybo
design, and route the design the same way as current master symbiflow-arch-defs. However when Vivado is given the same design with an explicit BUFH, Vivado generates an error because of the BUFH -> PS7 placement. The likely solution is to not emit explicit BUFH instances, but instead emit route through the BUFH withFIXED_ROUTE
's. This might be tricky, and is not the most important thing to work on right now.For now, I recommend we disable the DIFF_FASM test for
axi_regs_zybo
until this is fixed.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: