Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mattermost: 5.15.0 -> 5.20.1 #82172

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

jslight90
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation for this change

Update version of Mattermost.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@@ -207,8 +206,7 @@ in
PermissionsStartOnly = true;
User = cfg.user;
Group = cfg.group;
ExecStart = "${pkgs.mattermost}/bin/mattermost" +
(lib.optionalString (!cfg.mutableConfig) " -c ${database}");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this changing?

Was it wrong before, or is there a change in the verison upgrade that makes it wrong?

Please also write the answer into the commit message.

@nh2
Copy link
Contributor

nh2 commented May 29, 2020

This new version unbreaks new installs for me on 20.03: #89194 (comment)

@evils evils mentioned this pull request Jun 25, 2020
10 tasks
@ali-abrar ali-abrar mentioned this pull request Jul 17, 2020
10 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@ali-abrar ali-abrar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ryantm
Copy link
Member

ryantm commented Aug 15, 2020

We're past this version now. If the service needs updates, could you add that in a separate PR?

@ryantm ryantm closed this Aug 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants