Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nixos/doc: add a section mentioning GitHub team for nixos release managers #78625

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 27, 2020

Conversation

danbst
Copy link
Contributor

@danbst danbst commented Jan 27, 2020

This team should be kept up-to-date with each release.

Previously this info had to be grepped from appropriate Discourse thread.

I expect that this team can make final decisions over merge/don'tmerge PRs, and team can request additional review by-name/by-handle. I also expect that this team should normally be pinged only on approved PRs, so they are not "first-line" reviewers.

cc @NixOS/nixos-release-managers

…agers

This team should be kept up-to-date with each release.

Previously this info had to be grepped from appropriate Discourse thread.
@worldofpeace
Copy link
Contributor

Fab, was just thinking of this. I just probably mention it in https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixos-20-03-feature-freeze/5655.

Co-Authored-By: worldofpeace <worldofpeace@protonmail.ch>
@worldofpeace worldofpeace merged commit 31601a3 into NixOS:master Jan 27, 2020
@danbst danbst deleted the nixos-release-doc-github-team branch January 28, 2020 04:18
dtzWill pushed a commit to dtzWill/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2020
…agers (NixOS#78625)

* nixos/doc: add a section mentioning GitHub team for nixos release managers

This team should be kept up-to-date with each release.

Previously this info had to be grepped from appropriate Discourse thread.

Co-authored-by: worldofpeace <worldofpeace@protonmail.ch>
(cherry picked from commit 31601a3)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants