Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Four test-cases/example uses for RedWax modules. #80187

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

dirkx
Copy link
Contributor

@dirkx dirkx commented Feb 15, 2020

Three test cases that show/document use of the RedWax PKI modules. For the timestamping of a document (or software package); an x509 issueing path and a CRL/OCSP revocation service made (very) easy.

These testcases go a bit beyond a pure test - they essentially illustrate various uses cases.

  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

…nd one for the automatic issuing of certificates.
@dirkx dirkx changed the title Two test-cases/example uses for RedWax modules. Three test-cases/example uses for RedWax modules. Feb 15, 2020
@dirkx dirkx changed the title Three test-cases/example uses for RedWax modules. Four test-cases/example uses for RedWax modules. Feb 15, 2020
…/proper by using a lesser OCSP signing specific certifcate; so that the issuing key can be kept offline/further away from the OCSP service.
…voked publishing, signing and a timeserver/document signing service.
@dirkx
Copy link
Contributor Author

dirkx commented Mar 15, 2020

Replaced by PR82657 - which is against the (now) updated modules.

@dirkx dirkx closed this Mar 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant