Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

File I/O support #3

Closed
azonenberg opened this issue Apr 15, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

File I/O support #3

azonenberg opened this issue Apr 15, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
core Core application logic

Comments

@azonenberg
Copy link
Collaborator

We should support both old-school CSV as an interchange format and a protobuf-based (?) native serialization format.

File format design is nontrivial because channels may be sparse, have different sampling rates, etc. We should also save protocol decoder config in some way.

@bvernoux
Copy link
Contributor

Why not using something "standard" like sigrok file format for in/out and decoders ?

@azonenberg azonenberg added the core Core application logic label Apr 16, 2019
azonenberg added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2020
azonenberg added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2020
azonenberg added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 26, 2020
…ed; window dimensions, waveform group, and splitter config are serialized. No waveform area config or actual waveform data yet. See #3.
azonenberg added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2020
azonenberg added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2020
…eparate function. Began work on measurement serialization. See #3.
azonenberg added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 13, 2020
… file but not configure them or set up any UI. See #3.
azonenberg added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2020
…ession" to load a file directly as an argument. Implemented protocol decoder loading. See #3.
azonenberg added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2020
azonenberg added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2020
azonenberg added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core Core application logic
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants