Skip to content

bazel-*: Consistently self reference #84028

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2020

Conversation

Ericson2314
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

Using bazel_self for self-references makes managing bazel versions
easier: their less risk of changing defaults or copy pasted code for no
versions leading to incorrect self-references.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Sorry, something went wrong.

@Ericson2314 Ericson2314 requested a review from Profpatsch as a code owner April 1, 2020 20:15
Using `bazel_self` for self-references makes managing bazel versions
easier: their less risk of changing defaults or copy pasted code for no
versions leading to incorrect self-references.
@Ericson2314 Ericson2314 force-pushed the consistent-bazel-ref branch from 1da1991 to 6bf6ec8 Compare April 1, 2020 20:16
@ofborg ofborg bot added the 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package label Apr 1, 2020
@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from mboes April 1, 2020 20:23
@Ericson2314 Ericson2314 merged commit a5480d0 into NixOS:master Apr 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant