New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
nextcloud: home parameter breaks nextcloud #81623
Conversation
Does this still fail for you on current master? It does not seem to break the CI. |
@FlorianFranzen I don't know if the github CI ever turned red because of this pull request. I will test today and accordingly delete the pull request. |
Still failing |
Just took a brief look at this. This seems to happen since the
Due to this, PHPFpm can't read the config file in |
I guess the simple solution would be to just add documentation to the home parameter, right? |
Hmm, how about writing an assertion that checks if |
Hello, I'm a bot and I thank you in the name of the community for your contributions. Nixpkgs is a busy repository, and unfortunately sometimes PRs get left behind for too long. Nevertheless, we'd like to help committers reach the PRs that are still important. This PR has had no activity for 180 days, and so I marked it as stale, but you can rest assured it will never be closed by a non-human. If this is still important to you and you'd like to remove the stale label, we ask that you leave a comment. Your comment can be as simple as "still important to me". But there's a bit more you can do: If you received an approval by an unprivileged maintainer and you are just waiting for a merge, you can @ mention someone with merge permissions and ask them to help. You might be able to find someone relevant by using Git blame on the relevant files, or via GitHub's web interface. You can see if someone's a member of the nixpkgs-committers team, by hovering with the mouse over their username on the web interface, or by searching them directly on the list. If your PR wasn't reviewed at all, it might help to find someone who's perhaps a user of the package or module you are changing, or alternatively, ask once more for a review by the maintainer of the package/module this is about. If you don't know any, you can use Git blame on the relevant files, or GitHub's web interface to find someone who touched the relevant files in the past. If your PR has had reviews and nevertheless got stale, make sure you've responded to all of the reviewer's requests / questions. Usually when PR authors show responsibility and dedication, reviewers (privileged or not) show dedication as well. If you've pushed a change, it's possible the reviewer wasn't notified about your push via email, so you can always officially request them for a review, or just @ mention them and say you've addressed their comments. Lastly, you can always ask for help at our Discourse Forum, or more specifically, at this thread or at #nixos' IRC channel. |
0a3973b
to
ae5a16d
Compare
@Ma27 I took quite some time :D but I found some time to create the assertions. |
I marked this as stale due to inactivity. → More info |
This issue be closed in my opinion |
Agreed, while it's annoying, I think adding assertions for this specific service (while this can happen with any that have hardening) isn't a good solution. |
Motivation for this change
This pull request shows, that setting
services.nextcloud.home = "/home/nextcloud";
will break nextcloud. I just updated the test, and it fails when setting the parameter.Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)