Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ocamlPackages.lwt4: 4.4.0 → 4.5.0 #78771

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 4, 2020
Merged

ocamlPackages.lwt4: 4.4.0 → 4.5.0 #78771

merged 1 commit into from Feb 4, 2020

Conversation

vbgl
Copy link
Contributor

@vbgl vbgl commented Jan 29, 2020

Motivation for this change

Bugfixes. Latest version before the breaking 5.0

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@vbgl
Copy link
Contributor Author

vbgl commented Jan 29, 2020

@GrahamcOfBorg build acgtk flow jackline reason stog

@vbgl vbgl merged commit 21b4edc into NixOS:master Feb 4, 2020
@vbgl vbgl deleted the ocaml-lwt-4.5.0 branch February 4, 2020 08:48
@drewrisinger drewrisinger mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2020
Closed
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
6.topic: ocaml 8.has: package (update) 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
1 participant
@vbgl